Angelica Raggi vs Alexandra Irina Anghel Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• In recent months, Raggi has shown a slight edge on second serve points, claiming 38.27% compared to Anghel's 35.39%. Could this hint at a key advantage?
• Returning equally important: Raggi excels in returning serves, winning 50.31% of opponents' second serve points versus Anghel's 48.91%.
• When focusing on first serve returns, Raggi is markedly stronger, winning 36.63% of points, while Anghel achieves 29.27%.
• Under pressure, Raggi seems steadier, having saved 48.87% of breakpoints compared to Anghel’s 41.05%. Could this predict Raggi's composure on crucial points?
• Examining performance over the past year, Anghel has a higher win rate at 55% compared to Raggi's 50%.
• Surface proficiency shows Anghel performing best on Grass with a 60% win rate, whereas Raggi favors Hard courts with a 64% success rate.
• In terms of tournament levels, Anghel generally competes in Futures/ITF $10K events, winning 60.71% of matches. Raggi partakes mainly in Challengers/ITF > $10K tournaments, with a winning rate of 54.17%.
• Quality of opponents provides context: Anghel's matches are against higher-ranked players (average rank 161), while Raggi's are against lower-ranked players (average rank 384.5).
• If the match extends to a deciding set, Anghel performs marginally better, winning 50% of such sets compared to Raggi's 44%.
• Anghel converts breakpoints 33.9% of the time in recent form, while Raggi converts a more impressive 44.75%.

Editorial Prediction (August 13, 2025, UTC):

As they prepare to face off, recent performances and statistical advantages give us a clearer insight into predicting the likely outcome of this match.

Raggi demonstrates strengths in return games and first serve returns, coupled with superior breakpoint conversion in recent form, which could be crucial. Additionally, Raggi's stronger performance under pressure when saving breakpoints might play a pivotal role in tight situations.

Contrastingly, Anghel performs well in deciding sets, suggesting resilience in crucial moments, and has a slightly higher winning rate over the past year, indicating consistency.

The surface preference could also influence the match trajectory. However, given the comprehensive set of statistics, Raggi appears to have the upper hand in several key aspects.

Based on these insights, Raggi seems more likely to emerge victorious in this upcoming tennis encounter.